|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 15 post(s) |

Cutter Isaacson
Peace N Quiet
436
|
Posted - 2012.06.13 00:28:00 -
[1] - Quote
Solution seems simple enough. Don't go around hunting 2 week old pilots like some sad basement dwelling wanker. Then you won't have to worry about any rule breaking. Numbers of terminally stupid people seem to be on the increase, I suggest we have a real life Stupidageddon to rectify this issue. |

Cutter Isaacson
Peace N Quiet
436
|
Posted - 2012.06.13 01:18:00 -
[2] - Quote
Olleybear wrote:Doing a little bit of battleclinic research on the OP reveals the OP killed a 5 day old character, not just once, but 3 times within a 7 minute time frame. Perhaps this is what the GM was getting on you about?
Wow, what a complete muppet. Gonna go look for myself 
Numbers of terminally stupid people seem to be on the increase, I suggest we have a real life Stupidageddon to rectify this issue. |

Cutter Isaacson
Peace N Quiet
438
|
Posted - 2012.06.13 01:37:00 -
[3] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Tau Cabalander wrote:The Blood-Stained Stars arc is considered to be part of the New Player Experience (NPE).
I therefore can understand that the GMs might get tired of responding to "interference" petitions and start swinging the ban-hammer. GǪin which case they need to make this rules-change clear and actually reference which rule they're enforcing when swinging that hammer. DeMichael Crimson wrote:You can try to 'Rationalize Away' the issue all you want. Yes, asking them to communicate rules changes is pretty rational. Why are you so upset that people are asking for it?
I don't usually find myself agreeing with DeMichael, and even less often find myself disagreeing with you, but in this instance he is 100% correct and you seem to be nit picking a few words here and there while overlooking the glaringly obvious, so I shall re-quote it.
Posted: 2012.04.26 20:13
GM Homonoia wrote: Some rules are vague on purpose and they will remain vague. This is the 'reckless driving' equivalent. If I define the rules to the last dot someone will simply find a loop hole and use it. The rule is "do not mess with rookies", and if you are in doubt the answer is ALWAYS 'do not do it'.
Senior GM Homonoia | Info Group | Senior Game Master
See, it clearly says do not mess with rookies. It also says that the rule remains vague for a purpose, precisely the purpose that has been displayed in this thread, where people are asking for super accurate detailed sets of rules. Numbers of terminally stupid people seem to be on the increase, I suggest we have a real life Stupidageddon to rectify this issue. |

Cutter Isaacson
Peace N Quiet
438
|
Posted - 2012.06.13 01:41:00 -
[4] - Quote
Adriel Malakai wrote:So what people are conveniently skipping over here is the problem that this supposed ruling makes all of the SOE epic arc systems off limits for any kind of can flipping, ninja-ing, and baiting. This means that the following systems have been added to the 'no touch zone' (even against non-noobs, if we follow the way the rookie systems are handled):
- Arnon - Emsar - Manarq - Tar - Larvier - Ashokon - Attyn - Avyuh - Hatakani - Hek - Lustrevik - Tanoo - Harerget
And a few others I can't recall off the top of my head. The point of the OP wasn't to question whether or not shooting someone who just started the game is lame (which it is), but the fact that the GMs are arbitrarily enforcing a very clear rule in places it doesn't belong. The GMs need to make clear their expansion of systems, or actually train their GMs.
If they do plan expanding this protection to all epic arc systems, they need to think twice about how much protection this will offer to the veteran players who run the arcs (and who are, incidentally, the majority of the people who actually run the soe epic arc).
1: Show info on character. 2: Is character less than a month old? 3: If yes go to 5, if not go to 4. 4: Gank them. 5: Find someone who isn't a noob.
See how stupidly easy that is? Follow those simple rules when you scan down someone running an SOE mission and you'll be golden.
Numbers of terminally stupid people seem to be on the increase, I suggest we have a real life Stupidageddon to rectify this issue. |

Cutter Isaacson
Peace N Quiet
438
|
Posted - 2012.06.13 01:43:00 -
[5] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Cutter Isaacson wrote:I don't usually find myself agreeing with DeMichael, and even less often find myself disagreeing with you, but in this instance he is 100% correct and you seem to be nit picking a few words here and there while overlooking the glaringly obvious, so I shall re-quote it. No, he's pretty much 100% wrong because he has failed to understand the issue, as he always does. The quote you're using is completely irrelevant. The question is, as always, whether or not they have expanded the rules about can baiting/flipping to new systems without telling anyone. If so, could they please stop doing that and actually communicate such rules changes, because they have far-reaching implications.
The rule is DO NOT SCREW WITH NOOBS. How exactly is that hard to understand? The rule he posted and that I re-quoted is relevant to any situation involving noob pilots, it is not just about noob pilots in starter systems. Numbers of terminally stupid people seem to be on the increase, I suggest we have a real life Stupidageddon to rectify this issue. |

Cutter Isaacson
Peace N Quiet
438
|
Posted - 2012.06.13 01:45:00 -
[6] - Quote
Adriel Malakai wrote:Cutter Isaacson wrote:GM Homonoia wrote: Some rules are vague on purpose and they will remain vague. This is the 'reckless driving' equivalent. If I define the rules to the last dot someone will simply find a loop hole and use it. The rule is "do not mess with rookies", and if you are in doubt the answer is ALWAYS 'do not do it'.
Senior GM Homonoia | Info Group | Senior Game Master See, it clearly says do not mess with rookies. It also says that the rule remains vague for a purpose, precisely the purpose that has been displayed in this thread, where people are asking for super accurate detailed sets of rules. The question at hand is whether or not the rookie system rule, in which all can-baiting, ninja-ing, and can-flipping are COMPLETELY off limits - even against veteran players in that system. The OP wanted to know if the epic arc systems are now ruled as rookie systems, in which case all non-war related kills are outlawed. This is not about whether or not killing rookies is ok, but whether or not CCP decided to make a bunch of blatantly non-rookie systems, safe-zones. Learn to read before you post.
If you cannot tell the difference between a rookie and a veteran player using the very simple method of checking pilot info then you need more than rule clarification, you need glasses and possibly some form of medical intervention. Numbers of terminally stupid people seem to be on the increase, I suggest we have a real life Stupidageddon to rectify this issue. |

Cutter Isaacson
Peace N Quiet
439
|
Posted - 2012.06.13 01:48:00 -
[7] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Cutter Isaacson wrote:If you cannot tell the difference between a rookie and a veteran playerGǪ GǪis completely irrelevant because that is not the issue.
Tippia, generally I respect your opinion, I find the majority of your posts to be well thought out and intelligent. However, your complete inability to understand a very simple concept is causing my brain to overload. How is it you fail to understand that the rules regarding rookies are not just to cover them in the starter systems, but to cover them until they pass that magic 1 month mark? Numbers of terminally stupid people seem to be on the increase, I suggest we have a real life Stupidageddon to rectify this issue. |

Cutter Isaacson
Peace N Quiet
439
|
Posted - 2012.06.13 01:53:00 -
[8] - Quote
Tyberius Franklin wrote:Tippia wrote:Cutter Isaacson wrote:If you cannot tell the difference between a rookie and a veteran playerGǪ GǪis completely irrelevant because that is not the issue. DeMichael Crimson wrote:Exactly. You have already confirmed that you do not understand the rule being discussed GÇö no need to confirm it even further. I'm lost, what is everyone actually discussing at this point.
The op got warned/temp banned for repeatedly killing a rookie who was running an SOE Epic Arc mission. What people are arguing over is whether or not there has been a rule change regarding rookies.
The answer is no there hasn't been any change, it is merely that some people cannot wrap their heads around the idea that the rules in place for protecting rookies do NOT just cover their activities within the starter systems, but also ANY activity they undertake inherent to being a rookie, such as the SOE Epic Arc missions.
They have been told more than once that messing with rookies, at all, is not a good idea, whether it is in starter systems or not, and that the rules are left vague so as to avoid the issue with people finding and abusing loopholes in those rules. Numbers of terminally stupid people seem to be on the increase, I suggest we have a real life Stupidageddon to rectify this issue. |

Cutter Isaacson
Peace N Quiet
439
|
Posted - 2012.06.13 01:54:00 -
[9] - Quote
Adriel Malakai wrote:Cutter Isaacson wrote:If you cannot tell the difference between a rookie and a veteran player using the very simple method of checking pilot info then you need more than rule clarification, you need glasses and possibly some form of medical intervention.
EDIT: Clarification. The rule regarding rookies is not just to cover rookie systems, but to cover the rookies themselves, hence the lack of any super detailed rules as Homonia made quite clear. Quote:Can flipping / baiting
This refers to the practice of (ab)using the Criminal Flagging System to cause a fight between yourself and an unsuspecting party in high-security space. See main article for more.
Can flipping is officially considered griefing only in Rookie Systems. Some people do it just for fun, without the actual intent to cause the feelings of harassment and frustration in the victim. It is, however, also a typical form of griefing in the classic sense. SourceThe rules regarding rookie systems are explicitly clear. Doing anything but killing war targets in rookie systems is considered griefing, regardless of whether or not the target is a rookie. This means if the player is 6 years old and dies to you can flipping in the rookie systems, you have violated the EULA and can be warned/banned. If they expand the list of rookie systems to include the epic arc systems, this ruling also includes all non-rookies in those systems. So again, pull your head out of your ass before you post.
Dear god another person who does not understand. That is the rule for ROOKIE SYSTEMS. It is not the ONLY rule designed to cover rookies. Seriously, how can people be so thick?
Numbers of terminally stupid people seem to be on the increase, I suggest we have a real life Stupidageddon to rectify this issue. |

Cutter Isaacson
Peace N Quiet
439
|
Posted - 2012.06.13 01:58:00 -
[10] - Quote
Adriel Malakai wrote:Cutter Isaacson wrote:1: Show info on character. 2: Is character less than a month old? 3: If yes go to 5, if not go to 4. 4: Gank them. 5: Find someone who isn't a noob.
See how stupidly easy that is? Follow those simple rules when you scan down someone running an SOE mission and you'll be golden.
Way to be dense. The rookie system rules prevent any form of flipping, ninja-ing, etc in those systems, NOT just against rookies.
Way to be dense for not reading 90% of this thread, or the part of my quoted post where i mention SOE missions, which do not take place ONLY in rookie systems.
-10/10 for literacy issues. Numbers of terminally stupid people seem to be on the increase, I suggest we have a real life Stupidageddon to rectify this issue. |
|

Cutter Isaacson
Peace N Quiet
439
|
Posted - 2012.06.13 02:00:00 -
[11] - Quote
Adriel Malakai wrote:Cutter Isaacson wrote: Dear god another person who does not understand. That is the rule for ROOKIE SYSTEMS. It is not the ONLY rule designed to cover rookies. Seriously, how can people be so thick?
What you do NOT understand is that the warning/ban the OP was discussing mentioned that the epic arc systems WERE NOW CONSIDERED ROOKIE SYSTEMS. What people want to know is whether or not CCPs definition of rookie systems has been expanded. Have you even read the OP?
Learn to read. What the OP wants to know is if he got warned/banned because he was screwing with a rookie and breaking one of the rules covering rookies OR if the reason for his warning/ban is covered under the rookie system rule. Numbers of terminally stupid people seem to be on the increase, I suggest we have a real life Stupidageddon to rectify this issue. |

Cutter Isaacson
Peace N Quiet
439
|
Posted - 2012.06.13 02:03:00 -
[12] - Quote
Tippia wrote:
The question is: has this list of systems been expanded to include the (high-traffic, very normal) SOE-arc systems, giving them the same blanket restrictions as the old systems?
The OP did NOT say that he was warned/banned because the systems where the SOE systems are now covered by the rookie system rules, he just wants to know if that IS the case. What he AND you seem to have utterly missed is that there are OTHER rules in place to keep rookies safe from basement dwelling nubtards, and that THIS is why he got what was coming to him.
Numbers of terminally stupid people seem to be on the increase, I suggest we have a real life Stupidageddon to rectify this issue. |

Cutter Isaacson
Peace N Quiet
439
|
Posted - 2012.06.13 02:07:00 -
[13] - Quote
Adriel Malakai wrote:Cutter Isaacson wrote:Way to be dense for not reading 90% of this thread, or the part of my quoted post where i mention SOE missions, which do not take place ONLY in rookie systems.
-10/10 for literacy issues. I swear, you must have downs. The rules explicitly state that activities such as can-baiting and flipping are only considered griefing in rookie systems. They then explicitly list rookie systems. Now, warnings are being given stating that can-baiting in SOE epic arc systems is griefing, but there has never been any posts, blogs, nor announcements indicating that these systems have switched to being considered rookie systems. All the OP wants, is a confirmation whether or not these systems are now actually considered rookie systems. If they are, the GMs need to explicitly list every single system that is considered a rookie system, since you are not allowed to do any non-war related pvp in those systems. If these systems are not considered rookie systems, then this needs to be clarified, the warning/ban removed, and the GM staff informed of this.
Ok, for you, Tippia and any other people suffering severe literacy problems I shall make it clear.
THIS GUY GOT HIS BAN/WARNING FOR SCREWING WITH ROOKIES. THERE ARE OTHER RULES IN PLACE TO PROTECT THEM OTHER THAN THE ONES COVERING ROOKIE SYSTEMS. THESE RULES ARE LEFT VAGUE FOR THE PURPOSE STATED BY HOMONIA, THAT BEING TO STOP THE WANKERS FROM DOING WHAT THEY ALWAYS DO AND FINDING AND ABUSING THE LOOPHOLES.
There, I hope you can see that clearly enough. Numbers of terminally stupid people seem to be on the increase, I suggest we have a real life Stupidageddon to rectify this issue. |

Cutter Isaacson
Peace N Quiet
439
|
Posted - 2012.06.13 02:09:00 -
[14] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Simi Kusoni wrote:The answer: No. Incorrect. The answer is: we don't know; could the GMs please clarify. Cutter Isaacson wrote:The OP did NOT say that he was warned/banned because the systems where the SOE systems are now covered by the rookie system rules, he just wants to know if that IS the case. Now you're getting it.
Don't cherry pick my posts Tippia, it only serves to make you look inarticulate and incapable of holding up your end of a discussion. Numbers of terminally stupid people seem to be on the increase, I suggest we have a real life Stupidageddon to rectify this issue. |

Cutter Isaacson
Peace N Quiet
439
|
Posted - 2012.06.13 02:11:00 -
[15] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Cutter Isaacson wrote:Ok, for you, Tippia and any other people suffering severe literacy problems I shall make it clear.
THIS GUY GOT HIS BAN/WARNING FOR SCREWING WITH ROOKIES. GǪexcept we don't know that. So you can make your version as clear as you like. It doesn't alter or answer the question.
The answer to your question as well as the OP's
GM Homonoia wrote: Some rules are vague on purpose and they will remain vague. This is the 'reckless driving' equivalent. If I define the rules to the last dot someone will simply find a loop hole and use it. The rule is "do not mess with rookies", and if you are in doubt the answer is ALWAYS 'do not do it'.
Senior GM Homonoia | Info Group | Senior Game Master
Posting in the vain hope one of you learns to read sometime soon. Numbers of terminally stupid people seem to be on the increase, I suggest we have a real life Stupidageddon to rectify this issue. |

Cutter Isaacson
Peace N Quiet
439
|
Posted - 2012.06.13 02:14:00 -
[16] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Cutter Isaacson wrote:Don't cherry pick my posts Tippia Then don't cherry-pick the rules being asked about and the questions being asked. Also, don't make up your own facts. You can keep posting that quote. It is as irrelevant as the first time you posted it because it doesn't address the question in the slightest.
Just to repeat myself, yet again, I am making nothing up.
GM Homonoia wrote: Some rules are vague on purpose and they will remain vague. This is the 'reckless driving' equivalent. If I define the rules to the last dot someone will simply find a loop hole and use it. The rule is "do not mess with rookies", and if you are in doubt the answer is ALWAYS 'do not do it'.
Senior GM Homonoia | Info Group | Senior Game Master
Pretty sure my name is not GM Homonoia Numbers of terminally stupid people seem to be on the increase, I suggest we have a real life Stupidageddon to rectify this issue. |

Cutter Isaacson
Peace N Quiet
447
|
Posted - 2012.06.13 02:18:00 -
[17] - Quote
Tah'ris Khlador wrote:I just want to know whether or not CCP is officialy calling the SOE Epic Arc Systems rookie systems. The warnings/bans I originally spoke of specifically mentioned that they were for griefing in a rookie system, and that the event took place in Arnon. Specifically, the warnings were issued for griefing non-rookies in the epic arc systems, not for killing 2 week-old rookies.
Hunting week old characters is not worth anyone's time, and is not the point of the post. The problem is that the rookie system rule prevents me from killing the several month old dumbass flying a vindicator. CCP needs to clarify if these systems are now protected by the 'rookie-griefing' blanket ruling that prevents all non-war based pvp in those systems.
Strange that you say hunting rookies is not worth anyone's time. Considering the guy you killed 3 times in a row is only ten days old. Kinda makes people not believe anything else that comes out of your mouth. Numbers of terminally stupid people seem to be on the increase, I suggest we have a real life Stupidageddon to rectify this issue. |

Cutter Isaacson
Peace N Quiet
447
|
Posted - 2012.06.13 02:19:00 -
[18] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Cutter Isaacson wrote:Just to repeat myself, yet again, I am making nothing up. Ok. let's repeat what you said: GÇ£THIS GUY GOT HIS BAN/WARNING FOR SCREWING WITH ROOKIES.GÇ¥ Made up. The quote you keep using is as irrelevant as the first time you posted it because it only applies to your made-up case. The quote answers nothing. Repeating it answers nothing GÇö it just shows you've not understood what the question is.
And if you had bothered doing any background research in to this guy you would clearly see what so many others have. The guy likes to hunt rookies. It really doesn't take a genius grade intellect to work out what he got his ban/warning for. Honestly, I am disappointed in you Tippia, I thought you were above **** posting. Numbers of terminally stupid people seem to be on the increase, I suggest we have a real life Stupidageddon to rectify this issue. |

Cutter Isaacson
Peace N Quiet
447
|
Posted - 2012.06.13 02:25:00 -
[19] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Cutter Isaacson wrote:And if you had bothered doing any background research in to this guy GǪit would still not make your GǣfactGǥ any less made up. You're trying to answer a question that is not being asked because you assume that this answer will be the right one based on a completely different assumption about the facts of the case. The actual question being asked is whether the rookie-system rules has been expanded to include a whole new set of systems, and your precious quote doesn't answer this.
The question is coming from someone who has clearly lied, is most likely still lying and is quite clearly someone who has no problems killing rookies, despite his assertion that they are "not worth anyone's time". Why is it that you automatically believe him when he says that his warning was issued for something unrelated? Wool pulled over eye's much?
Numbers of terminally stupid people seem to be on the increase, I suggest we have a real life Stupidageddon to rectify this issue. |

Cutter Isaacson
Peace N Quiet
450
|
Posted - 2012.06.13 02:27:00 -
[20] - Quote
I really like arguing with you, its frikken hysterical. Numbers of terminally stupid people seem to be on the increase, I suggest we have a real life Stupidageddon to rectify this issue. |
|

Cutter Isaacson
Peace N Quiet
450
|
Posted - 2012.06.13 02:32:00 -
[21] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Cutter Isaacson wrote:The question is coming from someone who has clearly lied About what? More to the point: so what? Don't go for the ad hominem. It's still a question worth asking, and it's still worth a proper answer. Assuming that a different rule is being applied doesn't answer the question.
This entire thread is based on the word of a liar. He states that he got a specific type of warning for a specific type of action, what I am saying is that he got an entirely different warning for an entirely different type of action. There is more proof of what actually happened, than what he SAYS happened. Thus his question is invalid, and arguing in support of having it answered is an exercise in futility and an example of gross stupidity. Numbers of terminally stupid people seem to be on the increase, I suggest we have a real life Stupidageddon to rectify this issue. |

Cutter Isaacson
Peace N Quiet
450
|
Posted - 2012.06.13 02:34:00 -
[22] - Quote
Ranger 1 wrote:Just remember you two, you are more often on the same side than not.
Just sayin'.
Yeah I know Ranger, but thank you for saying so. Like I said I do usually agree with Tippia, and even on subjects where I believe the opposite, I can still respect his opinion. However in this instance it seems to me that he has allowed his feelings toward CCP and their rules to blind him to the clear and obvious truth.
Numbers of terminally stupid people seem to be on the increase, I suggest we have a real life Stupidageddon to rectify this issue. |

Cutter Isaacson
Peace N Quiet
450
|
Posted - 2012.06.13 02:36:00 -
[23] - Quote
Lord Maagnus wrote:holy wall of text Batman.
What in the actual F? Numbers of terminally stupid people seem to be on the increase, I suggest we have a real life Stupidageddon to rectify this issue. |

Cutter Isaacson
Peace N Quiet
450
|
Posted - 2012.06.13 02:42:00 -
[24] - Quote
Adriel Malakai wrote:Cutter Isaacson wrote:Tippia wrote:Cutter Isaacson wrote:The question is coming from someone who has clearly lied About what? More to the point: so what? Don't go for the ad hominem. It's still a question worth asking, and it's still worth a proper answer. Assuming that a different rule is being applied doesn't answer the question. This entire thread is based on the word of a liar. He states that he got a specific type of warning for a specific type of action, what I am saying is that he got an entirely different warning for an entirely different type of action. There is more proof of what actually happened, than what he SAYS happened. Thus his question is invalid, and arguing in support of having it answered is an exercise in futility and an example of gross stupidity. Regardless of whether or not the OP lied, the GMs should explicitly state whether or not the SOE epic arc systems are covered by the rookie system rule. I realize that you have trouble understanding this, and you're clinging onto anything you can because your ego will be destroyed by being wrong on the internet, but the question posed by the OP, regardless of whether or not everything in the OP was 100% accurate, needs to be answered.
Ha ha ha. You assume far too much dear poster, my ego does not rely on anything as mundane as a thread on a game forum. I am merely enjoying where this is going It should also be noted that if the OP has lied about the reason and circumstances for his warning/ban, then the question is irrelevant.
And since it is now 3:40am here and my need for fun has been fulfilled, I shall be off to bed.On a separate but related note, I'm thinking my application to join the CCL has been well and truly scuppered by now.
Numbers of terminally stupid people seem to be on the increase, I suggest we have a real life Stupidageddon to rectify this issue. |

Cutter Isaacson
Peace N Quiet
451
|
Posted - 2012.06.13 02:49:00 -
[25] - Quote
Simi Kusoni wrote: Nice posting
I'm gonna give you a nice cookie before I go to bed.
*gives cookie*
  
Numbers of terminally stupid people seem to be on the increase, I suggest we have a real life Stupidageddon to rectify this issue. |

Cutter Isaacson
Peace N Quiet
458
|
Posted - 2012.06.13 11:05:00 -
[26] - Quote
DeBingJos wrote:GM Homonoia wrote:
Let me state this very clearly here. We do NOT want experienced players to mess with rookies barely a week in. We are sure that you have worthier targets than these players who are still learning the ropes. If this behavior does not stop we may extend this rule to all systems that are covered in the Sisters of EVE epic arc. These systems are:
- Tar - Harerget - Hatakani - Hek - Lustrevik - Tanoo - Lisudeh - Sosh - Manarq - Chainelant
Hek? a rooky system? WTF? I do not like where you are going. Give the new people a better tutorial so they understand the consequences of their actions instead of putting up these artificial limitations.
Since you seem not to understand what the GM is saying, I'll make it clearer. They are telling you to leave the rookies alone who are running their SOE Epic Arc missions. Get it?
ROOKIES = OFF LIMITS.
It really isn't that difficult. If you are so bad at EVE that the only viable targets for you are rookie pilots, then you should probably reconsider if EVE is the game for you.
EDIT: GM Homonoia beat me to it  Numbers of terminally stupid people seem to be on the increase, I suggest we have a real life Stupidageddon to rectify this issue. |

Cutter Isaacson
Peace N Quiet
458
|
Posted - 2012.06.13 11:13:00 -
[27] - Quote
Simi Kusoni wrote:
Although its odd thinking of Hek as a rookie system.
I don't think it's so much that Hek or any of the other systems are going to be re-classed as rookie systems, but that the rules set up for rookie systems will also ensure the safety of rookies who are sent to non-rookie systems as part of their NPE.
(my apologies for abusing the word rookie in this post, I did not sleep well last night ) Numbers of terminally stupid people seem to be on the increase, I suggest we have a real life Stupidageddon to rectify this issue. |

Cutter Isaacson
Peace N Quiet
458
|
Posted - 2012.06.13 11:16:00 -
[28] - Quote
DeBingJos wrote:Akirei Scytale wrote:DeBingJos wrote:Akirei Scytale wrote:DeBingJos wrote: I do not like where you are going. Give the new people a better tutorial so they understand the consequences of their actions instead of putting up these artificial limitations.
Which actions, exactly? undocking for the first time?  Most new players get canflipped, or they steal from a can labeled 'Free stuff'. Then they become red to and die. Stuff like this can be explained in the tutorials. so shooting someone who literally has no idea what can flipping even means is your idea of a fight? FFS, come visit nullsec. I guarantee you'll find a real fight. Read my post. I'm saying that the tutorials should explain the dangers of stealing form cans and other common things like canflipping. If the new players understand the dangers, rules like these should not be needed.
Pretty sure the tutorial DOES cover things like this. The problem isn't that the rookies are committing these acts, but that they are being griefed by older players who are too lame to find a REAL target. Numbers of terminally stupid people seem to be on the increase, I suggest we have a real life Stupidageddon to rectify this issue. |

Cutter Isaacson
Peace N Quiet
458
|
Posted - 2012.06.13 11:21:00 -
[29] - Quote
Andre Jean Sarpantis wrote:DeBingJos wrote:Akirei Scytale wrote:DeBingJos wrote: I do not like where you are going. Give the new people a better tutorial so they understand the consequences of their actions instead of putting up these artificial limitations.
Which actions, exactly? undocking for the first time?  Most new players get canflipped, or they steal from a can labeled 'Free stuff'. Then they become red to and die. Stuff like this can be explained in the tutorials. Oh Wow....seems you are one of those which happily show newbies how harsh Eve is in their very first start....you know the Tutorials require to dock off and get the first ship? And then a newbie returns sees a can labeled 'free stuff' until then he had just done the first step YOU REALLY think he would know about those consequences taking the stuff inside this can will have for him? Geezus Christ....GM Homonoia should maybe have a look in your kill list and find alot of Newbie kills in it.....if so...enjoy your vacation my friend. mfg Andre Jean Sarpantis ( Roleplayed nephew from the Serpentis Founder )
Or before you accuse people you could go check his killboard and realise he pretty much seems to live and kill in 0.4 and below, and within the first 5 pages of his latest kills there aren't ANY rookie kills at all. All he was doing was stating a fairly well known fact and suggesting a way to prevent it from happening. Numbers of terminally stupid people seem to be on the increase, I suggest we have a real life Stupidageddon to rectify this issue. |

Cutter Isaacson
Peace N Quiet
458
|
Posted - 2012.06.13 11:26:00 -
[30] - Quote
Grinder2210 wrote:
Well i dont like it but
Ty for anwsering
Good lord, please learn to quote properly. Also are you really complaining because you aren't allowed to grief rookies? Are you really that crap at EVE that you consider them targets? Numbers of terminally stupid people seem to be on the increase, I suggest we have a real life Stupidageddon to rectify this issue. |
|

Cutter Isaacson
Peace N Quiet
458
|
Posted - 2012.06.13 11:34:00 -
[31] - Quote
DeBingJos wrote:GM Homonoia wrote:Tippia wrote:Cutter Isaacson wrote:I don't think it's so much that Hek or any of the other systems are going to be re-classed as rookie systems, but that the rules set up for rookie systems will also ensure the safety of rookies who are sent to non-rookie systems as part of their NPE. Yeah, see, that's still not the same thing, and that's where the entire problem lies: The rookie system rule does not just ensure the safety of rookies GÇö it ensures the safety of everyone. That's why reclassification of systems is a bad idea. It's also why referring to that rule outside of the actual rookie systems is a bad idea: because if we're just talking about the GÇ£don't mess with rookiesGÇ¥ policy, then it's not the rookie system rule. Finally, having two separate rules is also a bad idea because then it comes down the rules-lawyering about when someone is considered a rookie and not GÇö that differentiation will suddenly make all the difference in these not-actually-rookie-systems. Those are the same rules. There is no difference. You cannot mess with rookies. You can mess with anyone else no matter the system. veterans are NOT protected in rookie systems. Then define a rookie please.Is it a player on a trial account? How can we see this ingame?
Sweet jesus you people are not very bright. Lets say anyone under a month old? Would that do you? Seems reasonable enough to me. Numbers of terminally stupid people seem to be on the increase, I suggest we have a real life Stupidageddon to rectify this issue. |

Cutter Isaacson
Peace N Quiet
458
|
Posted - 2012.06.13 11:38:00 -
[32] - Quote
I think Forrest Gump said it best
Forrest Gump wrote: Stupid is as stupid does
Seems to cover the attitude and mental capacity of those who believe that rookies are viable targets. Numbers of terminally stupid people seem to be on the increase, I suggest we have a real life Stupidageddon to rectify this issue. |

Cutter Isaacson
Peace N Quiet
459
|
Posted - 2012.06.13 11:46:00 -
[33] - Quote
Adriel Malakai wrote:GM Homonoia wrote:Can flipping is specifically mentioned because it is impossible to target someone specific. If you can flip a veteran in a rookie system we will (most likely) not take action against you. But if a rookie takes the bait you better not open fire. I definitely understand the not-shooting at rookies if they take a flipped can, I was more concerned with the more common use-case of can-flipping, which is simply stealing to gain aggro against the owning player/corporation. As long as it's still legal to steal from non-rookies and kill them (via flipping, stealing, ganking, ninjaing, war, or any other means) in these systems, then this is a perfectly reasonable rule. If these 25 systems are 100% safe zones for all players, then that's completely out of line and goes against the whole "no-where is safe" thing.
The only ones who were EVER safe ANYWHERE in EVE were the rookies, both in their starter systems and now (because some people are just pathetic and like to kill rookies) possibly the SOE Epic Arc systems as well. Everyone else, everywhere else, is a fair target. Numbers of terminally stupid people seem to be on the increase, I suggest we have a real life Stupidageddon to rectify this issue. |

Cutter Isaacson
Peace N Quiet
459
|
Posted - 2012.06.13 12:05:00 -
[34] - Quote
Adriel Malakai wrote:Cutter Isaacson wrote:The only ones who were EVER safe ANYWHERE in EVE were the rookies, both in their starter systems and now (because some people are just pathetic and like to kill rookies) possibly the SOE Epic Arc systems as well. Everyone else, everywhere else, is a fair target. Even after sleeping you seem to be unable to understand anything that is said in this thread. If you read my posts, I actually stated that rookies should be protected in these systems. The problem is that the pages that state the rules regarding these systems indicate that everyone is completely safe in the listed systems, but the GMs here are saying that this is only kinda-sorta true, and will be arbitrarily decided on a case-by-case basis. What several of us are asking for is the page to fully explain the rules - so that it is clear that only rookies are protected (even if rookie is not explicitly defined), but that non-rookie pilots are fair game. If this is not explicitly stated, all this will lead to is even more petitions that are hashed out because some veteran in a drake got ninjad/killed in Arnon, then cried because it was against the rules, even though it apparently isn't.
And clearly YOU cannot read.
GM Homonoia wrote:
Those are the same rules. There is no difference. You cannot mess with rookies. You can mess with anyone else no matter the system. veterans are NOT protected in rookie systems.
Ta da!!
Next illiterate nincompoop please! Numbers of terminally stupid people seem to be on the increase, I suggest we have a real life Stupidageddon to rectify this issue. |

Cutter Isaacson
Peace N Quiet
460
|
Posted - 2012.06.13 12:25:00 -
[35] - Quote
Inzax wrote:Instead of banning noob griefers have CCP put contracts on them. A known griefer goes red and is gankable in noob systems for "x" amount of days/time without CCP interference. Perhaps make the griefer a target in all of high sec? Let the players police the issue.
I am sure this is a terrible idea...flame away.
It is a terrible idea, and I support it fully   Numbers of terminally stupid people seem to be on the increase, I suggest we have a real life Stupidageddon to rectify this issue. |

Cutter Isaacson
Peace N Quiet
461
|
Posted - 2012.06.13 12:30:00 -
[36] - Quote
Adriel Malakai wrote:Cutter Isaacson wrote:Ta da!!
Next illiterate nincompoop please! Why I'm still bothering to respond to you is beyond me, but here goes. GM Homonoia wrote:Adriel Malakai wrote:GM Homonoia wrote:Can flipping is specifically mentioned because it is impossible to target someone specific. If you can flip a veteran in a rookie system we will (most likely) not take action against you. But if a rookie takes the bait you better not open fire. I definitely understand the not-shooting at rookies if they take a flipped can, I was more concerned with the more common use-case of can-flipping, which is simply stealing to gain aggro against the owning player/corporation. As long as it's still legal to steal from non-rookies and kill them (via flipping, stealing, ganking, ninjaing, war, or any other means) in these systems, then this is a perfectly reasonable rule. If these 25 systems are 100% safe zones for all players, then that's completely out of line and goes against the whole "no-where is safe" thing. See the post made by GM Spiral above. GM discretion is applied here and we generally do not protect veteran players, but if a rookie gets caught in the crossfire we act accordingly. SourceThis is why I want it clearly stated on the wiki page, as the GM answers, regarding non-rookies, are literally changing every-other post.
I see where you having issues here. As was brought up earlier by Tippia, the terms can-flipping and can baiting seem to be being used interchangeably, which clearly they are not. The rules themselves are not "changing every other post" it's just that people need to be a bit clearer about which can related activity is being discussed. Also you are correct in stating that the wiki page needs an update.
I should also point out that any antagonism I levelled at you is entirely down to the way in which you responded to my post earlier, where I was actually agreeing with you and clarifying something you seemed to be struggling with.
Numbers of terminally stupid people seem to be on the increase, I suggest we have a real life Stupidageddon to rectify this issue. |

Cutter Isaacson
Peace N Quiet
461
|
Posted - 2012.06.13 12:35:00 -
[37] - Quote
DeBingJos wrote:Remember, adding non-rookie systems like Hek and Arnon to the list opens up other griefing oppurtunities
1. Create new toon 2. Set course to Hek 3. Probe a mission runner 4. Steal loot 5. Report him for griefing when he shoots you< 6. Collect tears.
I am still very much in favor of improving the tutorials with a lot of info about game mechanics instead of these rules.
A simple check by a Dev or GM to find any other characters on the same account, or any accounts linked to the same email address or customer information would cover most of those eventualities. There are ways around that but it would require a fair amount of effort, not something your ordinary rookie ganker is capable of.
Anyone going so far as to set up another account under false credentials, using a separate email address and possibly even a different IP address just to grief other players using this mechanic is not going to be swayed by the rules, no matter HOW harsh they are, because clearly they would be mentally ill.
Numbers of terminally stupid people seem to be on the increase, I suggest we have a real life Stupidageddon to rectify this issue. |

Cutter Isaacson
Peace N Quiet
464
|
Posted - 2012.06.13 12:53:00 -
[38] - Quote
Terranid Meester wrote:Personally I feel some of the GM's are not up to the job and their discretion is poorly implementated. I also feel that rookies should not be protected and in-game mechanics should be used in place to help rookie pilots understand the basic nature of eve. If a rookie gets killed its not as if they lose much in the first place. What if a new player buys a character with an officer fit tengu. Can they be classed as rookies? What about alts?
I don't kill rookies myself unless Im at war with them or something like that.
Personally I don't think a GM or a senior GM response is good enough in this manner. I would much prefer an official GM response and also some CSM responses.
And people like you are exactly the reason such rules DO exist. Perhaps when you are all growed up, and you run your own business that relies on not only getting, but retaining, new customers then you will have a slightly better attitude. Numbers of terminally stupid people seem to be on the increase, I suggest we have a real life Stupidageddon to rectify this issue. |

Cutter Isaacson
Peace N Quiet
464
|
Posted - 2012.06.13 13:02:00 -
[39] - Quote
GM Homonoia wrote:Terranid Meester wrote:Gatosai wrote:Terranid Meester wrote:Personally I feel some of the GM's are not up to the job and their discretion is poorly implementated. I also feel that rookies should not be protected and in-game mechanics should be used in place to help rookie pilots understand the basic nature of eve. If a rookie gets killed its not as if they lose much in the first place. What if a new player buys a character with an officer fit tengu. Can they be classed as rookies? What about alts?
I don't kill rookies myself unless Im at war with them or something like that.
Personally I don't think a GM or a senior GM response is good enough in this manner. I would much prefer an official GM response and also some CSM responses. oh yea sure might as well ask your local butcher for his opinion too i suppose? Local butcher might be the mayor or a member of the parish council. I meant to say CCP response. You got a CCP response. /me looks at my GM tag. Yep, CCP
GM troll is best troll. 
Numbers of terminally stupid people seem to be on the increase, I suggest we have a real life Stupidageddon to rectify this issue. |

Cutter Isaacson
Peace N Quiet
464
|
Posted - 2012.06.13 13:04:00 -
[40] - Quote
Adriel Malakai wrote:Since The Mittani controls CCP, according to certain threads about Inferno 1.1 in the Test Feedback Forum, shouldn't you be asking for a response from him?
/tinfoil
0/10 could try harder. Numbers of terminally stupid people seem to be on the increase, I suggest we have a real life Stupidageddon to rectify this issue. |
|

Cutter Isaacson
Peace N Quiet
468
|
Posted - 2012.06.13 14:03:00 -
[41] - Quote
Khanh'rhh wrote:Cutter Isaacson wrote:I really like arguing with you, its frikken hysterical. As with most people arguing against Tippia and getting ALL CAPS LOCK ALL THE TIME mad about it, you have no idea how misinformed you look to the rest of us. It's a good /popcorn thread at your expense, so thanks for that.
As I pointed out to some other rather misinformed poster yesterday, what you see as me being "mad" is just your poorly judged assumption. I also use capslock as a form of emphasis on certain words in place of bold or italics, and because of the fact that you can't increase the font size so that the terminally stupid, illiterate and partially sighted people can read it. Numbers of terminally stupid people seem to be on the increase, I suggest we have a real life Stupidageddon to rectify this issue. |

Cutter Isaacson
Peace N Quiet
468
|
Posted - 2012.06.13 15:08:00 -
[42] - Quote
Morganta wrote:I never finished SOE, does that make me a rookie if I go do it now?
does the GM and CCP realize that the only thing left in eve worth doing anymore is tear harvesting?
does CCP and the GM not see that that would indicate a huge failure of their game when players would rather **** people off than do one of several legitimate in-game activities?
does this not speak volumes to you guys?
No, it just says something about the mentality of the players. Throwing that responsibility on to CCP's shoulders is akin to a rapist blaming their actions on the woman for the way she dresses. Numbers of terminally stupid people seem to be on the increase, I suggest we have a real life Stupidageddon to rectify this issue. |

Cutter Isaacson
Peace N Quiet
468
|
Posted - 2012.06.13 15:11:00 -
[43] - Quote
Gatosai wrote:Cutter Isaacson wrote:Morganta wrote:I never finished SOE, does that make me a rookie if I go do it now?
does the GM and CCP realize that the only thing left in eve worth doing anymore is tear harvesting?
does CCP and the GM not see that that would indicate a huge failure of their game when players would rather **** people off than do one of several legitimate in-game activities?
does this not speak volumes to you guys? No, it just says something about the mentality of the players. Throwing that responsibility on to CCP's shoulders is akin to a rapist blaming their actions on the woman for the way she dresses. so i kill hulks because of their low cut blouses?
Probably the way they wiggle their mining lasers. Numbers of terminally stupid people seem to be on the increase, I suggest we have a real life Stupidageddon to rectify this issue. |

Cutter Isaacson
Peace N Quiet
468
|
Posted - 2012.06.13 15:16:00 -
[44] - Quote
Morganta wrote:Cutter Isaacson wrote:Morganta wrote:I never finished SOE, does that make me a rookie if I go do it now?
does the GM and CCP realize that the only thing left in eve worth doing anymore is tear harvesting?
does CCP and the GM not see that that would indicate a huge failure of their game when players would rather **** people off than do one of several legitimate in-game activities?
does this not speak volumes to you guys? No, it just says something about the mentality of the players. Throwing that responsibility on to CCP's shoulders is akin to a rapist blaming their actions on the woman for the way she dresses. huh?
Oh dear lord, I'll explain in crayon.
There are plenty of other things people can do in game. Saying that people gank rookies due to a lack of content or because CCP have somehow failed with EVE is so mind bogglingly stupid I am surprised that the internet even allowed it to be posted.
People gank rookies because they are sad little bastards. It is their mindset to automatically go for the weakest and the youngest targets, mostly because rookies are almost entirely incapable of knowing how or when to fight back. Hence my previous post.
Blame the mentality of the player for their actions, not CCP.
Numbers of terminally stupid people seem to be on the increase, I suggest we have a real life Stupidageddon to rectify this issue. |

Cutter Isaacson
Peace N Quiet
468
|
Posted - 2012.06.13 15:45:00 -
[45] - Quote
Possum's Awesome wrote:Cutter Isaacson wrote:People gank rookies because they are sad little bastards. It is their mindset to automatically go for the weakest and the youngest targets, mostly because rookies are almost entirely incapable of knowing how or when to fight back.
Another sad carebear projecting his own thought process on other players. This game, ultimately, is about one player blowing up* (teehee) another PERIOD, DOT, End of Sentence. All those rookie poppers are doing is introducing them to the cold hard truth of EVE. They're trying right from the start to filter out the whiney little anti-pvp kids from those that can understand what this game is about right from day one. Aura tells rookies what to expect from this game, if they ignore that lovely voice, they do so at their own peril. There's a rookie channel for those newbies, there's Aura, there's the forums, there's thousands of newbie articles. Countless resources for those new guys to go to, to figure out what's happened and how to stop it. You, sir, are a doodyhead. Poopbreath.
First up, what has me being a carebear got to do with anything? Secondly, all those rookie poppers are doing is proving how well the mentally disturbed/low IQ community are doing at finding something to do on the internet, that does not mean it is a good thing.
As for your assertion that there are plenty of resources for noobs, you are absolutely correct, what you seem to have forgotten, or were maybe too poorly educated to understand, is that people need time to assimilate all that information. That's why rookies are given more protection than everyone else.
If all of this is too difficult for you to follow, I would be happy to arrange for the cast of sesame street to perform this post for you, with the aid of crayon pictures and smaller words. Numbers of terminally stupid people seem to be on the increase, I suggest we have a real life Stupidageddon to rectify this issue. |

Cutter Isaacson
Peace N Quiet
468
|
Posted - 2012.06.13 15:50:00 -
[46] - Quote
Gatosai wrote:
socratic...is that you? XD
Who? Numbers of terminally stupid people seem to be on the increase, I suggest we have a real life Stupidageddon to rectify this issue. |

Cutter Isaacson
Peace N Quiet
468
|
Posted - 2012.06.13 15:52:00 -
[47] - Quote
THE L0CK wrote:Well it looks like we may be coming to the end of thread with the personal attacks and mudslinging now so I just wanted to say Thank you, 5 stars, was a great read and will read again.
Hey, it took 15 pages to get to that point. For a moronic thread posted on GD, I would say it did well to get this far. Here is your cookie for visiting, have a nice day!
*gives cookie*
Numbers of terminally stupid people seem to be on the increase, I suggest we have a real life Stupidageddon to rectify this issue. |
|
|
|